On March 11, 1944, the famous Eremitani Church in Padua (Italy) was destroyed in an Allied bombing along with the inestimable frescoes by Andrea Mantegna et al. contained in the Ovetari Chapel. In the last 60 years, several attempts have been made to restore the fresco fragments by traditional methods, but without much success. One of the authors contributed to the development of an efficient pattern recognition algorithm to map the original position and orientation of the fragments, based on comparisons with an old gray level image of the fresco prior to the damage. This innovative technique allowed for the partial reconstruction of the frescoes. Unfortunately, the surface covered by the colored fragments is only 77 m, while the original area was of several hundreds. This means that we can reconstruct only a fraction (less than 8%) of this inestimable artwork. In particular the original color of the blanks is not known. This begs the question of whether it is possible to estimate mathematically the original colors of the frescoes by making use of the potential information given by the available fragments and the gray level of the pictures taken before the damage. Moreover, is it possible to estimate how faithful such a restoration is? In this paper we retrace the development of the recovery of the frescoes as an inspiring and challenging real-life problem for the development of new mathematical methods. Then we shortly review two models recently studied independently by the authors for the recovery of vector valued functions from incomplete data, with applications to the recolorization problem. The models are based on the minimization of a functional which is formed by the discrepancy with respect to the data and additional regularization constraints. The latter refer to joint sparsity measures with respect to frame expansions, in particular wavelet or curvelet expansions, for the first functional and functional total variation for the second. We establish relations between these two models. As a major contribution of this work we perform specific numerical test on the real-life problem of the A. Mantegna’s frescoes and we compare the results due to the two methods. MSC: 15A29, 47A52, 68U10, 94A08, 94A40
5 Figures and Tables
Figure 1: Fragmented A. Mantegna’s frescoes (1452) by a bombing in the Second World War. Computer based reconstruction by using efficient pattern matching techniques .
Figure 7: Mutual differences of the first example (see Figure 5) in red, green, and blue channels of the recolorized images by the means two methods (first row) and in the L, a, b channels (second row).
Figure 8: Squared mean of mutual differences of the first example (see Figure 5) in red, green, and blue representation (left) and Squared mean of mutual differences with respect to a and b channels (right).
Figure 9: Mutual differences of the first example (see Figure 6) in red, green, and blue channels of the recolorized images by the means two methods (first row) and in the L, a, b channels (second row).
Figure 10: Squared mean of mutual differences of the first example (see Figure 6) in red, green, and blue representation (left) and Squared mean of mutual differences with respect to a and b channels (right).
Download Full PDF Version (Non-Commercial Use)